ByWillAtkinson.com

November 4th, 2005

Critical column has black Winthrop students up in arms

Posted by Administrator in Will Atkinson, News, Winthrop U., Editorial

Column critical of black students lights off brouhaha
Black fraternity calls for resignation of student paper’s editors

Many minority students are angry over a column that ran in Winthrop University's The Johnsonian on Nov. 2

In the Nov. 2, 2005 edition of Winthrop University’s The Johnsonian, copy editor Christine Byington wrote a column critical of some black student’s opinions.

The first sentence of the column, “Black people at Winthrop will probably be angry,” would give Nostradamus a run for his money. Many Winthrop students are incensed over the column.

Alpha Phi Alpha, the predominantly black fraternity, called for the resignation of the entire Johnsonian staff at a rally held Thursday night in Tillman Hall. Over two hundred people packed Tillman auditorium to capacity.

Shouting matches have been reported in the cafeteria, minority students are demanding repercussions and the Johnsonian’s editors (of which I am one) are coming under fire.

As much as Byington’s opinions might be reprehensible to some, it is within her rights to publish them. Her column did not contain any falsities, it did not harm anyone’s reputation and it is not hate speech. Under the first amendment, Byington has the express right to publish her opinion.

The Johnsonian will publish controversial opinions. The staff desires students to discuss and be interested topics addressed in the paper.

The opinions, however, are just that – opinions. Nothing more, nothing less. They do not represent the staff’s views, just the columnist’s.

We invite responses and articles from across the ideological spectrum.

…..

And now, for your intellectual digestion, here is the Christine Byington’s controversial article presented in its entirety:

Student observes double standards at Winthrop
By Christine Byington
Copy Editor

Black people at Winthrop will probably be angry. And I’m sure they will proclaim that Christine Byington doesn’t care about black people. If you care, however, you will read this thoughtfully.

To begin, I think it’s important to state a fact obvious to those who know me well. I don’t mean to implicate all blacks in this. I just have a problem with the belligerent ones who think we aren’t doing enough for them.

Hurricane Katrina brought back to the public attention the ongoing issue of race relations in America. The tragedy quickly shifted from concern for the people affected by the hurricane to the judgment that the federal government did not like black people. Obviously, the federal government has a vendetta against the blacks and chose not to respond to them quickly, right?

Hurricane Katrina brought back to the public attention the ongoing issue of race relations in America.

I guess we’re assuming that the many people of various ethnic backgrounds in the Bush administration don’t care about black people, either.

Today in the daily student announcements I saw the “Black Fact of the Week.” I did not have a problem with this in itself. Surely it is important for us to understand the contributions of black people in our lives. However, this is just one piece of an ever-complicating problem on campus. In case you don’t know, there are quite a few groups on Facebook devoted to black people. Two in particular caught my attention: “Winthrop Does Not Like Black People” and “I Should’ve Went To a Blacker College.”

The first group describes itself as, “a group for people that agree that Winthrop is not a university for black people. Winthrop really doesn’t try to do anything for blacks and black people has to work so hard to get things here.” My main point with that description, being the amateur grammarian that I purport to be, is that the first step to “get things here” is to use proper English. To get what you want, you have to work hard. I don’t think this is a problem unique to black people. Everyone has to work hard in college. I also wonder what they want. If anyone who is a member of that group would like to inform us what they want, then that would be super. My friends and I hypothesize that professors are equal opportunity dislikers. They don’t necessarily make things difficult for you because of your skin color or any other variable. They make things difficult because they can.

I don’t think this is a problem unique to black people. Everyone has to work hard in college.

Seriously, though, what would you like Winthrop to do more of for you? I’m sure the administration would like to hear your options because they dedicate themselves to making Winthrop a positive learning environment. No, that was not a facetious comment.

The second group I mentioned begins its description with a simple question: “Are u sick of not finding anyone good to do your hair without paying an arm and a leg? Do you ever see an HBCU’s band and then hear the sorry Winthrop Pep Band and feel ashamed? Do you find yourself fleeing to other colleges just to enjoy a REAL homecoming (ex: football team)? Did you look around the first day of orientation and was like what the hell did I get myself into? Then you should have gone to a blacker college!”

I think this opinion I am about to write applies to everyone who complains for house about Winthrop. If you hate the school so much, you have options. Namely, go ahead and go to another college. This Facebook group brings up the issue of having no football team at Winthrop. I don’t know about anyone else, but I knew Winthrop didn’t have a football team when I applied. Chances are you did too.

I have enjoyed many-a-comment in class about the plight of black people. Now, I understand taking pride in your heritage. However, it is just that – heritage. We no longer hose people in the streets. I’d say if you have the freedom to sit in a classroom and state those opinions, you’ve got it pretty well. I think the problem many people see with all the racially based arguments is that it seems those who argue the points are using past experience as present justification. They still think that the United States is a racist country and that the country isn’t doing enough for them.

I think the problem many people see with all the racially based arguments is that it seems those who argue the points are using past experience as present justification.

I am a Republican and I definitely believe in the Republican-esque approach to achievement: Anyone can succeed in life if they try hard enough. Sure, there might have been many barriers to black success 40 years ago. However, it is 2005. With the exception of a minority of businesses and perhaps universities, there are not many barriers to deal with anymore. In fact, I think there has been a surge in specialized programs for people of various ethnic backgrounds. For example, I’ve been looking into summer research programs in psychology. I’ve noticed that most of the programs are limited to students of ill-represented groups (i.e., ethnic minorities). I am only half black and I don’t want to use that as my way to get into a program.

Ultimately, I think we need to achieve more equality. To be truly equitable, for example, we should offer programs that are specifically for whites. Yes, I just said that. I’m sure a lot of people just slammed the paper down and spouted a few expletives. But don’t you see the logic here? It can’t be a problem in one instance and not in another. Kids, that’s called a double standard.

To be truly equitable, for example, we should offer programs that are specifically for whites.

This happens far too often, though. Some blacks are happy with the programs that benefit them. Once a similar programs starts that is gears toward whites, all of a sudden the program becomes racist. Like a person I know said once, if an Association of Ivorites was established on campus, people would be up in arms. We need only look at the case of a whites-only scholarship established at Roger Williams University last year. The group who sponsored the scholarship did so not out of racism but out of a desire to be fair.

Those who complain about the state of affairs tend to cit this desire for fairness. However, to be truly fair, we should offer such specialized opportunities for various groups in America. We should also offer White Facts of the Day and Hispanic Facts of the Day, among others.

I think it’s important to mention the groups on Facebook that are devoted to intelligent and articulate blacks. It’s somewhat disappointing when that it perceived as a surprise. I’m sure if you approached any of those people and asked them what people in their families or communities though of them, you’d probably find a few who would tell you people didn’t like them. Some in the black community frown upon black students succeeding in life. I think we have a problem when we need Facebook groups to highlight articulate blacks on campus. While others are spending time complaining about the way things are, there are students at this school who are doing something about those problems.

Some in the black community frown upon black students succeeding in life.

A basic observation of people would show you that if you devote time to complaining about the way things are (Jesse Jackson), you don’t have as much time to devote to finding effective solutions. To the angry black people who might be reading this column, understand that I do not mean ill will toward you. Basically, I’m the “safe” person to write this because I’m biracial. Know that there are many people on this campus who feel the same way I do but who do not want to air their opinions in the Johnsonian because, well, they are white.

I think it’s sad when some whites feel they must stifle their opinions because of the color of their skin. That must be what life was like for blacks in the 1950s.

9 Responses to ' Critical column has black Winthrop students up in arms '

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to ' Critical column has black Winthrop students up in arms '.


  1. on November 4th, 2005 at 11:13 pm

    XXXX FLASH XXXX

    This story is scheduled to run across the top of the fold in Sunday’s Herald.

    XXXX


  2. on November 6th, 2005 at 9:30 am

    William: Can you have this student send me an email? I would like to publish it.

  3. Calvin Abram said,

    on November 7th, 2005 at 11:11 am

    Ms. Byington is obviously confused…first, she is biracial yet she claims to be white; secondly, she only needs to look up the definition of equal to ascertain her entire article is incorrect. In order to have equality, two or more parties have to begin on even playing fields. This dispairtity between blacks and whites does not allow fairness. Finally, if Ms. Byington researched her article before beginning her myopic opinion she would know the vast majority of scholarships are awarded to whites; therefore by making white only scholarships organizations are awarding more scholarships to whites and further destroying the fabric of equality on an educational basis.

    Calvin Abram, MPA

  4. Ben said,

    on November 7th, 2005 at 4:14 pm

    To Mr. Abram’s points:

    To me, Ms. Byington hardly seems confused… she just doesn’t agree with you.

    1) Individuals of diverse ancestry can, and often do, choose to identify with only one aspect of that ancestry. It is becoming more common for people to choose an exclusive biracial identity (not “black” or “white”), but it is at least equally valid for those same individuals to choose an inclusive biracial identity (”black” AND “white”.) The one-drop rule and the notion of exclusive and objective racial categories are but stubborn vestiges of a less enlightened period.

    2) Honest question: how will America know when the playing field is level? The achievement gap will not close until the culture of anti-intellectualism loses its death grip on the Black community. The imprisonment gap will not close until Black men stop committing an inordinate proportion of this country’s violent crimes.

    It is, for the first time in history, well within *our* power to level the playing field. But we must choose to devote our energy to constructive endeavors rather than to the continual scapegoating of predominantly well-intentioned white people.

    In any case, Ms. Byington has taken a thoroughly defensible (if, at times, clumsily articulated) stance in a valid debate, and I look forward to the dialogue it will prompt.

  5. Supporter said,

    on November 7th, 2005 at 11:32 pm

    I fully and whole heartedly support all of Christine Byington’s opinions.

  6. Shayla Kirkland said,

    on November 8th, 2005 at 2:52 pm

    In response to “Supporter”

    If you “fully and whole heartedly support all of Christine Byington’s opinions”, why aren’t you confident enough to submit your name? Maybe there is a conscious in there.

  7. Calvin Abram said,

    on November 8th, 2005 at 4:59 pm

    How is it you say Ms. Byington is not confused when her statement reads, “Now, I understand taking pride in your heritage. However, it is just that – heritage. We no longer hose people in the streets. I’d say if you have the freedom to sit in a classroom and state those opinions, you’ve got it pretty well.”(Byington, 2005). This is the common us, they quote. She is identifying herself as white and not biracial; therefore enters confusion.

    Also, your “Black men stop committing an inordinate proportion of this country’s violent crimes.” (Ben, 2005), is nothing but unfounded hatred that is sold to white America. It is known and documented by the Harvard Institute and other accredited researchers and think tanks blacks are not given equal treatment in the judicial system. Furthermore if you look in the NCVS you will see that whites commit more violent crimes than blacks, but when you choose to use percentages it skews the actual results of any research on violent crimes.

    You also asked, “Honest question: how will America know when the playing field is level? The achievement gap will not close until the culture of anti-intellectualism loses its death grip on the Black community” (Ben). Are you saying because Blacks are not ignorant and naive to the present practices of white America they are not intellectual? The Harvard Institute conducted a study in which the results were a white man with a felony conviction has a better opporutunity (2+) to obtain an entry-level professional job than a black man with a degree and similar qualifications, and the black man has no felony conviction.

    Finally, what is your definition of a well intentioned white person? I am a black man with a B.S. and a Master’s Degree and my working career I have recognized many of white males having positions in which they are not qualified to hold. As a matter of fact many of them do not have a college degree.

    I do agree that “we” (blacks) need to have more action in works and less in words, but also we can ill afford to not understand the oppression that exists today. I know I am not the only person that understands what a “white card” is and the “glass ceiling”.

    Calvin Abram, MPA

  8. rob said,

    on November 11th, 2005 at 2:06 am

    speaking of skewing…. ever think the “we” she was referring to was the country and the “your” being a general statement?? Note the difference between ms. byington BEING confused and causing you to be confused or INVITING confusion.

    now… “Finally, if Ms. Byington researched her article before beginning her myopic opinion she would know the vast majority of scholarships are awarded to whites” the vast majority of scholarships are AWARDED to whites. percentages and skewing again you see. just because more scholarships are awarded to white people, doesnt necessarily mean they are given preferential treatment. if there are more white people applying for these scholarships, as im sure there are (theres a reason these groups are called minorities), then it makes sense that the majority of scholarships are awarded to white people, doesnt it??

    and …. “therefore by making white only scholarships organizations are awarding more scholarships to whites and further destroying the fabric of equality on an educational basis.” so just so i know, equal doesnt mean equal anymore?? because from what im reading, equal means that black people are allowed to set up racially discriminative scholarship programs, and the other ethnicities arent?? separate but not equal, hmm??

    and honestly, you can find studies that say pretty much anything you want to hear.

    “Finally, what is your definition of a well intentioned white person? I am a black man with a B.S. and a Master’s Degree and my working career I have recognized many of white males having positions in which they are not qualified to hold. As a matter of fact many of them do not have a college degree.” sorry, i dont see how this relates to anything. ben was saying that black people need to focus their energy on constructive things instead of blaming the well-intentioned white people. meaning (what i took from it) that the majority of white people these days arent slave-owners and they arent trying to hold black people down, and as such really shouldnt be blamed for the things they sometimes get blamed for. really has little to do with jobs and qualifications. ive seen plenty of people (white, black, purple, brown, yellow, whatever) that arent qualified for positions they hold, im not entirely sure what race has to do with that. side note: you dont need a college degree to get a good job.

    while i honestly have no idea what a “white card” is, im pretty sure that the “glass ceiling” generally refers to the glass ceiling of women in the workplace.

    now, knowing the way these conversations usually go, i will pre-emptively state that im neither black nor white. im mexican. but as we know, that shouldnt matter.

    -rob, sans any fancy letters after my name (yet).


  9. on September 6th, 2007 at 12:49 pm

    Free Chat Rooms

    I couldn’t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting

Leave a comment

ByWillAtkinson.com logo